Skip to main content

AKBAYAN YOUTH v. COMELEC CASE DIGEST G.R. No. 147066


AKBAYAN YOUTH v. COMELEC
G.R. No. 147066, 26 March 2001
BUENA, J.:

FACT:
1.      Petitioners―representing the youth sector―seek to direct the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) to conduct a special registration before the 14 May 2001 General Elections, of new voters ages 18 to 21. According to petitioners, around four million youth failed to register on or before the 27 December 2000 deadline set by the respondent COMELEC under Republic Act No. 8189.
2.      Memorandum No. 2001-027 on the Report on the Request for a Two-day Additional Registration of New Voters Only is submitted but was then denied by the COMELEC under Resolution No. 3584 on 8 February 2001.
3.      Aggrieved by the denial, petitioners filed a Petition for Certiorari and Mandamus.
4.      Section 8 (System of Continuing Registration of Voters) of R.A. No. 8189 The Voter’s Registration Act of 1996 provides:
The personal filing of application of registration of voters shall be conducted daily in the office of the Election Officer during regular office hours. No registration shall, however, be conducted during the period starting one hundred twenty (120) days before a regular election and ninety (90) days before a special election.

 Lazada Philippines
ISSUE:
1.      WHETHER OR NOT respondent COMELEC committed grave abuse of discretion in issuing COMELEC Resolution dated 8 February 2001.
2.      WHETHER OR NOT the Supreme Court can compel respondent COMELEC, through the extraordinary writ of mandamus, to conduct a special registration of new voters during the period between the COMELEC’s imposed 27 December 2000 deadline and the 14 May 2001 general elections.

RULING:
1.      It is well-settled that the law does not require that the impossible be done. A two-day special registration for new voters would give rise to time constraints due to additional pre-election matters. Accordingly, COMELEC acted within the bounds and confines of the applicable law on the matter. In issuing the assailed Resolution, respondent simply performed its constitutional task to enforce and administer all laws and regulations relative to the conduct of an election.
2.      The Supreme Court cannot control the exercise of discretion of a public officer where the law imposes upon him the duty to exercise his judgment in reference to any manner in which he is required to act, because it is his judgment that is to be exercised and not that of the court. The remedy of mandamus lies only to compel an officer to perform a ministerial duty, not a discretionary one.
 Lazada Philippines
MAXIM:
1.      Nemo tenetur ad impossible. The law obliges no one to perform an impossibility.
2.      Impossibilium nulla obligato est. In other words, there is no obligation to do an impossible thing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

G.R. Nos. 152613 & 152628 APEX MINING CO., INC., vs. Southeast Mindanao Gold Mining Corp.,(SEM) et. al CASE DIGEST

G.R. Nos. 152613 & 152628 APEX MINING CO., INC., vs. Southeast Mindanao Gold Mining Corp.,(SEM) et. al  G.R. No. 152619-20 BALITE COMMUNAL PORTAL MINING COOPERATIVE vs. southeast mindanao gold mining corp.  G.R. No. 152870-71 THE MINES ADJUDICATION BOARD AND ITS MEMBERS, THE HON. VICTOR O. RAMOS (Chairman), UNDERSECRETARY VIRGILIO MARCELO (Member) and DIRECTOR HORACIO RAMOS (Member) vs. southeast mindanao gold mining corporation  FACTS: A motion for reconsideration was filed by SEM. The Assailed Decision held that the assignment of Exploration Permit (EP) 133 in favor of SEM violated one of the conditions stipulated in the permit. It also ruled that the transfer of EP 133 violated Presidential Decree No. 463, which requires that the assignment of a mining right be made with the prior approval of the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). Moreover, the Assailed Decision pointed out that EP 133 expired by non-renew...
Post a Comment
Read more

G.R. No. 115104 Macawiwili Gold Mining and Dev. Co., et al v. Court of Appeals CASE DIGEST

Macawiwili Gold Mining and Dev. Co., et al v. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 115104 October 12, 1998 FACTS: The Supreme Court recognized the possessory right of Macawiwili and Omico over mining claims in Benguet as against Philex Mining Corp. On the surface of these mining claims,Philex owned improvements consisting of roads, facilities, and bunkhouses that were used byPhilex in its other mining claims. Philex sought to expropriate the surface of the area wherethese improvements were located pursuant to Section 59 of PD 463. HELD: The land cannot be expropriated. Expropriation demands that the land be private land.When the Supreme Court awarded the possessory rights over the land to Macawiwili andOmico, it stripped the land of its private character and gave it its public character – to be utilizedfor mining operations. Property already devoted to public use may be expropriated only if donedirectly by the national legislature or under a specific grant of authority to the d...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fernandez vs HRET CASE DIGEST GR No 187478

Fernandez vs HRET | GR No 187478 | December 21, 2009 Topic: House of Representatives > Residency Requirement  Facts:  On the May 14, 2007 elections, petitioner filed for candidacy as Representative of the First Legislative District of the Province of Laguna. In his Certificate of Candidacy, he indicated that he is a resident of Sta. Rosa City, Laguna. Private respondent sought the cancellation of petitioner’s COC and the latter’s disqualification as a candidate on the ground of an alleged material misrepresentation in his COC regarding his place of residence, because during past elections, he had declared Pagsanjan, Laguna as his address, and Pagsanjan was located in the Fourth Legislative District of the Province of Laguna. Private respondent likewise claimed that petitioner maintained another house in Cabuyao, Laguna, which was also outside the First District. The petition, however, was dismissed by COMELEC for lack of merit.  On June 27, 2007, petitioner was...
Post a Comment
Read more